[2001] UKIAT 4
- Case title: MF JF (Sufficiency of Protection, Anti-Semitic Acts, Anti-Russian Acts)
- Appellant name: MF JF
- Status of case: Reported
- Hearing date:
- Promulgation date:
- Publication date:
- Last updated on:
- Country: Lithuania
- Judges: Mr J Barnes, Mrs E Hurst JP, Mr C Thursby
- Case Notes: This determination was removed from the Coutry Guidance list on the 08.11.04
- Keywords Sufficiency of Protection, Anti-Semitic Acts, Anti-Russian Acts
The decision
AM
Heard at: Field House
APPEAL NO: TH/43723/2001
On: 9 January 2002
(01/TH/3691)
[2002]UKIAT00004
IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL
Before:
Mr A R Mackey
Between
Ms ANGELA SOPHIE EWERS-DALHOUSE
APPELLANT
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
RESPONDENT
DETERMINATION AND REASONS
1. This determination is made pursuant to Rules 23 and 30 (1) of the Immigration and Asylum Appeals (Procedure) Rules 2000.
2. The appellant, who is a citizen of Jamaica, appeals against the determination of an Adjudicator, Andrew Jordan, who dismissed the appeal of the appellant for non-appearance.
3. The grounds of appeal were referred to when leave to appeal was granted. It is apparent that the appellant was unable to attend the hearing because of problems with her former solicitors. As a result the correct forms were not lodged. In the circumstances the Tribunal has decided after giving all parties the opportunity to make representations on the issue and taking into account the provisions of Rule 20 of the Procedure Rules above referred to, to remit this appeal for a re-hearing. No objection has been made to the proposed course. The appeal is accordingly allowed to the extent that it is remitted to be heard afresh by an Adjudicator other than Andrew Jordan.
Mr A R Mackey
Vice President
Heard at: Field House
APPEAL NO: TH/43723/2001
On: 9 January 2002
(01/TH/3691)
[2002]UKIAT00004
IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL
Before:
Mr A R Mackey
Between
Ms ANGELA SOPHIE EWERS-DALHOUSE
APPELLANT
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
RESPONDENT
DETERMINATION AND REASONS
1. This determination is made pursuant to Rules 23 and 30 (1) of the Immigration and Asylum Appeals (Procedure) Rules 2000.
2. The appellant, who is a citizen of Jamaica, appeals against the determination of an Adjudicator, Andrew Jordan, who dismissed the appeal of the appellant for non-appearance.
3. The grounds of appeal were referred to when leave to appeal was granted. It is apparent that the appellant was unable to attend the hearing because of problems with her former solicitors. As a result the correct forms were not lodged. In the circumstances the Tribunal has decided after giving all parties the opportunity to make representations on the issue and taking into account the provisions of Rule 20 of the Procedure Rules above referred to, to remit this appeal for a re-hearing. No objection has been made to the proposed course. The appeal is accordingly allowed to the extent that it is remitted to be heard afresh by an Adjudicator other than Andrew Jordan.
Mr A R Mackey
Vice President