AA/06877/2014

  • Case title:  
  • Appellant name:
  • Status of case: Unreported
  • Hearing date:
  • Promulgation date:
  • Publication date:
  • Last updated on:
  • Country:
  • Judges:

The decision






Upper Tribunal
(Immigration And Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/06877/2014

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Heard at: Field House
Decisions and Reasons Promulgated
On: 19 February 2015
On 3 March 2015


Before

DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MAILER

Between

Mr Jan Mohammed Miakhail
(no anonymity direction made)
Appellant
and

secretary of state for the home department
Respondent
Representation

For the Appellant: Ms V Easty, counsel (instructed by Sultan Lloyd Solicitors)
For the Respondent: Mr T Wilding, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

DECISION AND REASONS
1. On 30 December 2014 the decision of the First-tier Tribunal dismissing the appellant's appeal was set aside following a hearing. The First-tier Tribunal Judge had not sufficiently engaged with three reports that had been produced. This resulted in a failure to consider the relevance of the appellant's mental health issues insofar as the respondent was contemplating removing him to Kabul.
2. In particular, there was reference by the Judge to a complete lack of evidence from a consultant psychiatrist. There had been evidence produced from Dr Applebee who had specific training in psychiatric conditions. Further, the First-tier Tribunal had considered alternatives to the causes for the appellant's depression. He had not set out any of his experience or qualifications entitling such conclusions to be drawn. Moreover, it is not clear in any event whether being removed from the culture of his birth or from his family or chemical imbalance or vitamin deficiency can be responsible for causing PTSD.
3. In the circumstances, the question of whether it would be unreasonable or unduly harsh for this appellant to be returned to Kabul was required to be grappled with and evaluated in greater depth. This had not taken place.
4. The decision was accordingly set aside.
5. At a case management hearing on 19 February 2015, the parties submitted at the outset that the matter should be remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for a fresh decision. It was requested that the matter be submitted to Taylor House at the convenience of the parties.
6. I have had regard to the Senior President's Practice Statement regarding the issue of remitting an appeal to the First-tier Tribunal for a fresh decision. In applying the Statement I am satisfied that the effect of the error has been to deprive the appellant before the First-tier Tribunal of a full opportunity of having his case properly presented and considered. Moreover, I am satisfied that there will be a substantial amount of evidence led.
Notice of Decision
The appeal is accordingly remitted to the First-tier Tribunal (Taylor House) for a fresh decision to be made. The date arranged is 13 August 2015
No anonymity direction is made.



Signed: Deputy Upper tribunal Judge Mailer
Date: 2/3/2015