IA/19172/2014

  • Case title:  
  • Appellant name:
  • Status of case: Unreported
  • Hearing date:
  • Promulgation date:
  • Publication date:
  • Last updated on:
  • Country:
  • Judges:

The decision









UPPER Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
Appeal Number: IA/19172/2014


THE IMMIGRATION ACTS


Heard at: Field House
Determination Promulgated
On: 27 October 2014
On 10 November 2014
Prepared: 6 November 2014



Before

DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MAILER


Between

Mr Vijay Kumar
no anonymity direction made
Appellant
and

secretary of state for the home department
Respondent

Representation

For the Appellant: Ms A Nizami, Counsel (instructed by Pioneer Solicitors)
For the Respondent: Mr S Walker, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer


DETERMINATION AND REASONS
1. The appellant is a national of India, born on 28th May 1984. His appeal against the decision of the respondent dated 16th April 2014 to refuse his application for leave to remain in the UK as a Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) Migrant was dismissed by First-tier Tribunal Judge Narayan in a determination promulgated on 12th July 2014. The appeal was determined on the papers.
2. He found that the appellant was not entitled to any points in respect of attributes and access to funds as required under the rules.
3. On 1st September 2014, First-tier Tribunal Judge Page granted the appellant permission to appeal. He found the determination confusing to read. Paragraph 14 ran into nearly two pages. Without identifying any particular arguable error of law, Judge Page simply stated that given the complexity of the issues raised in the application for permission, this was a case where permission to appeal should be granted.
4. Ms Nizami, on behalf of the appellant, gave notice of the withdrawal of the appellant's case. This she did orally at the hearing.
5. Mr Walker did not oppose the giving of such notice of withdrawal.
6. Pursuant to paragraph 17(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, I consent to the withdrawal.
7. In the circumstances, the Upper Tribunal must notify each party in writing of the withdrawal of the appellant's case under Rule 17 of the 2008 Rules.



Signed

Date 6/11/2014

C R Mailer
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge