The decision



Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/50258/2013



THE IMMIGRATION ACTS


Heard at Glasgow
Determination Promulgated
On 02 September 2014
On 05 September 2014



Before

The President, The Hon. Mr Justice McCloskey and
Upper Tribunal Judge Dawson

Between

SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Appellant
and

ZULFIQAR ROBINA
Respondent

Representation:

Appellant: Mr Matthews, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
Respondent: Mr Bryce (Advocate), instructed by Mackinlay & Suttie Solicitors


DECISION

1. By a decision dated 02 July 2013, the Appellant refused the Respondent's application for leave to remain in the United Kingdom. The refusal was based on the Respondent's failure to provide an approved English language comprehension certificate. The First-tier Tribunal allowed the appeal.

2. Since the promulgation of the first instance decision, the Appellant has secured the requisite certificate. She did so on 28 April 2014. We were informed that this was transmitted to the Appellant on 15 May 2014. Regrettably, it appears to have received no attention.

3. On behalf of the Appellant, Mr Matthews conceded that the certificate satisfies the requirements of paragraph 284 of the Immigration Rules and applied to withdraw the appeal. We acceded to his application, having first drawn attention to the wholly unsatisfactory terms in which the application for permission to appeal was couched. The fundamental flaw was to identify, clearly or at all, the error of law said to infect the first instance Tribunal's decision. In this context, we take the opportunity of highlighting the recent decision of the Upper Tribunal in Nixon (permission to appeal: grounds) [2014] UKUT 368 (IAC).

ORDER

4. The Appellant is granted permission to withdraw the appeal. Thus the decision of the FtT is affirmed.





Signed:

THE HON. MR JUSTICE MCCLOSKEY
PRESIDENT OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER

Date: 03 September 2014