PA/10922/2019

  • Case title:  
  • Appellant name:
  • Status of case: Unreported
  • Hearing date:
  • Promulgation date:
  • Publication date:
  • Last updated on:
  • Country:
  • Judges:

The decision



Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/10922/2019


THE IMMIGRATION ACTS


Heard at Manchester Civil Justice Centre
Via Skype for Business
Decision & Reasons Promulgated
On 31 July 2020
On 7 August 2020



Before

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE LANE


Between

ROSALINDE [M]
(ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE)
Appellant
and

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent


Representation:
For the Appellant: Mr Kumar, Optimus Law
For the Respondent: Mrs Aboni, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer


DECISION AND REASONS
1. The appellant was born on 17 November 1985 and is a female citizen of Cameroon. She was refused international protection by the respondent by a decision dated 29 October 2019. She appealed to the First-tier Tribunal which, in a decision promulgated on 21 February 2020, dismissed her appeal. The appellant now appeals, with permission, to the Upper Tribunal.
2. At the initial hearing at Manchester by Skype for Business on 31 July 2020, Mrs Aboni, who appeared for the Secretary of State, told me that she did not seek to support the decision of the First-tier Tribunal. At [6], the judge had stated that no application had been made at the First-tier Tribunal hearing for the appellant be treated as a vulnerable witness. Mrs Aboni told me that she believed this was incorrect as an application had, in effect, been made in the skeleton argument produced by the appellant's representatives. Although the judge records in her decision the allowances that she made for the appellant's mental health difficulties, crucially no mention of those difficulties appears to have been taken into account in the judge's analysis of the credibility of the appellant's account. I agree with Mrs Aboni that this latter omission undermined the decision of the judge such that her decision should be set aside and the appeal determined de novo.

Notice of Decision
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside. None of the findings of fact shall stand. The appeal is returned to the First-tier Tribunal (not Judge Young-Harry; French interpreter; 1.5 hours; the First-tier Tribunal sitting at Birmingham; first available date) for that Tribunal to remake the decision following a hearing de novo.


Signed Date 31 July 2020
Upper Tribunal Judge Lane