UI-2024-001594 & UI-2024-001595

  • Case title:  
  • Appellant name:
  • Status of case: Unreported
  • Hearing date:
  • Promulgation date:
  • Publication date:
  • Last updated on:
  • Country:
  • Judges:

The decision



IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER
Case No: UI-2024-001594
UI-2024-001595

First-tier Tribunal No: HU/61365/2023
HU/61366/2023

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Decision & Reasons Issued:

On 15th of November 2024

Before

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DANIEL SHERIDAN

Between

Erik Kondratskyi
Ionna Kipen
Appellants
And

Entry Clearance Officer
Respondent

DECISION MADE WIHTOUT A HEARING PURSUANT TO RULE 34 OF THE Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008

BackgrounD

1. The appellants have been granted permission to challenge a decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Haria.
2. On 11 October 2024 the respondent filed a Rule 24 response, stating the following:
1. The respondent to this appeal is the Secretary of State for the Home Department. Documents relating to this appeal should be sent to the Secretary of State for the Home Department, at the above email address.
2. The respondent does not oppose the appellant’s application for permission to appeal and invites the Tribunal to remit the matter to the First-tier Tribunal with jurisdiction to hear the appeals.
In the interim, the Entry Clearance Officer has indicated that the applications will be reconsidered after liaising with the applicants. Once any further representations are received by the ECO, it is anticipated that a consideration will be made within 28 days
3. In the light of the Rule 24 response, I am satisfied that it is in accordance with the overriding objective to make a decision without a hearing in the following terms, which reflects the outcome sought by both parties.
DECISION
4. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside and the appeal is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be made afresh by a different judge.

D. Sheridan
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Immigration and Asylum Chamber

12.11.2024