Displaying Decision 3841 - 3870 of 9893 in total (most recent first)

Reference number Status Promulgation date Country
PA/10091/2018 Unreported
HU/03565/2018 Unreported
JR/03953/2018 Unreported
HU/16807/2018 Unreported
HU/09215/2018 Unreported
HU/23209/2018 & Ors. Unreported
HU/09753/2018 Unreported
Search result:
...facts found in terms of Devaseelan; the basis of the dependency claim was not made out and the judge found similarly...
HU/08949/2017 Unreported
PA/06817/2017 Unreported
HU/20395/2018 Unreported
HU/10327/2018 Unreported
HU/09215/2018 Unreported
HU/24669/2018 & HU/24667/2018 Unreported
PA/11617/2018 Unreported
HU/15662/2017 Unreported
JR/05792/2018 Unreported
[2019] UKUT 217 Reported Not applicable
Case title: R (on the application of Sutharsan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (UT rule 29(1): time limit)
PA/13980/2018 Unreported
PA/02294/2018 Unreported
HU/06166/2018 Unreported
EA/05234/2017 Unreported
PA/12399/2018 Unreported
PA/01022/2019 Unreported
OA/09103/2015 Unreported
Search result:
...that there was no proper consideration about the issue of dependency which is a matter which needs to be considered and...
EA/03450/2015 Unreported
Search result:
...the evidence before for him did not support the asserted dependency but indicated rather that the appellant was living in the...
PA/02111/2018 Unreported
EA/07602/2018 Unreported
HU/01336/2019 Unreported
PA/08595/2018 Unreported
PA/13664/2018 & PA/13665/2018 Unreported
Displaying Decision 3841 - 3870 of 9893 in total (most recent first)