Information Immigration and asylum chamber: decisions on appeals to the Upper Tribunal
Displaying Decision 6241 - 6270 of 10005 in total (most recent first)
| Reference number | Status | Promulgation date | Country |
|---|---|---|---|
| PA/00932/2016 | Unreported | ||
| DA/01252/2014 | Unreported | ||
| IA/21994/2015 | Unreported | ||
| PA/01642/2015 | Unreported | ||
| AA/00152/2016 & Ors. | Unreported | ||
| IA/20065/2014 & IA/20066/2014 | Unreported | ||
| VA/01478/2015 | Unreported | ||
| PA/00754/2016 | Unreported | ||
| PA/00986/2016 | Unreported | ||
| DA/00002/2016 | Unreported | ||
| IA/03277/2015 | Unreported | ||
| IA/24225/2015 | Unreported | ||
|
Search result:
...that the judge failed to identify whether there was prior dependency or prior membership of a household and that the judge's... |
|||
| IA/42649/2014 & Ors. | Unreported | ||
| IA/14617/2015 | Unreported | ||
|
Search result:
...follow Sala. Reasons for Finding an Error of Law Prior Dependency on an EEA National 5. In Ihemedu (OFMs - in... |
|||
| IA/09720/2015 | Unreported | ||
| IA/18189/2015 & IA/18199/2015 | Unreported | ||
| PA/04157/2016 | Unreported | ||
| AA/01014/2015 | Unreported | ||
| IA136192015 & IA316252015 | Unreported | ||
| EA/02138/2015 | Unreported | ||
|
Search result:
...there was no adequate basis to support the Appellant's claimed dependency and dismissed the appeal. 6. The judge was not however... |
|||
| HU/13268/2015 | Unreported | ||
| PA/02247/2015 | Unreported | ||
| AA/02354/2015 | Unreported | ||
| AA/04498/2014 | Unreported | ||
| AA/11407/2014 | Unreported | ||
| PA/01844/2015 | Unreported | ||
| PA/03735/2015 & PA/02876/2015 | Unreported | ||
| HU/00126/2015 | Unreported | ||
|
Search result:
...years old. There was no evidence of further elements of dependency that went beyond normal emotional ties between adult relatives. For... |
|||
| PA/02449/2015 | Unreported | ||
| IA/27200/2015 | Unreported | ||
|
Search result:
...First-tier Tribunal, on 3 August 2016 makes reference to previous dependency before the Appellant entered the United Kingdom but it is... |
|||