Displaying Decision 7651 - 7680 of 9875 in total (most recent first)

Reference number Status Promulgation date Country
IA/27149/2014 Unreported
IA/19470/2014 Unreported
IA/39586/2014 Unreported
IA/04732/2014 & ors Unreported
OA/14726/2013 & OA/14730/2013 Unreported
AA/06998/2014 Unreported
IA/26856/2014 & IA/26853/2014 Unreported
OA/15257/2013 Unreported
VA/18360/2013 & VA/18361/2013 Unreported
Search result:
...living together in a household and there were elements of dependency that is not the case here. The Appellants and their...
AA/03126/2014 Unreported
IA/31280/2014 & IA/31285/2014 Unreported
OA/20574/2013 & OA/20578/2013 Unreported
VA/19742/2013 Unreported
Search result:
...is one between adult relatives that discloses no aspect of dependency or of being any different from what might be expected...
IA/15458/2014 & Ors. Unreported
IA/44937/2013 & IA/44946/2013 Unreported
AA/07091/2011 Unreported
IA/31546/2014 Unreported
IA/38892/2013 Unreported
Search result:
...evidence (see paragraphs 3 to 4 above). The fact of dependency has been asserted, and there is nothing to suggest that...
IA/17607/2014 & IA/15806/2014 Unreported
Search result:
...that she looked after. 33. There was no evidence of dependency of the second appellant upon the sponsor. The second appellant...
IA/02651/2014 Unreported
Search result:
...appellant was residing with her sponsor. With regard to earlier dependency , the judge found that the evidence was insufficient, concluding...
IA/31283/2014 Unreported
IA/18999/2014 & IA/35001/2014 Unreported
IA/19284/2014 Unreported
[2015] UKUT 272 Reported Not applicable
Case title: R (on the application of Kaienga) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (IJR)
OA/02839/2014 Unreported
IA/03338/2014 Unreported
IA/10448/2014 Unreported
IA/07327/2014 Unreported
DA/00576/2013 & DA/00577/2013 Unreported
VA/00364/2014 Unreported
Displaying Decision 7651 - 7680 of 9875 in total (most recent first)