Information Immigration and asylum chamber: decisions on appeals to the Upper Tribunal
Displaying Decision 8431 - 8460 of 10201 in total (most recent first)
| Reference number | Status | Promulgation date | Country |
|---|---|---|---|
| OA/21862/2013 | Unreported | ||
| OA/17752/2013 | Unreported | ||
| AA/01496/2014 | Unreported | ||
| IA/33464/2013 | Unreported | ||
| AA/04960/2014 & Ors. | Unreported | ||
| DA/02550/2013 | Unreported | ||
| IA/23392/2014 | Unreported | ||
| VA/13752/2013 | Unreported | ||
|
Search result:
...the Immigration Judge failed to take into account the emotional dependency of the sponsor on the appellant and the fact that... |
|||
| IA/42353/2013 & Ors. | Unreported | ||
|
Search result:
...when considering family life there must be additional ties of dependency beyond normal emotional ties between related adults. The Judge was... |
|||
| DA/02316/2013 | Unreported | ||
| IA/26734/2013 & IA/26758/2013 | Unreported | ||
| IA/34697/2013 | Unreported | ||
| OA/10087/2013 & Ors. | Unreported | ||
| IA/32737/2013 | Unreported | ||
| AA/09935/2013 | Unreported | ||
| IA/30608/2013 & Ors. | Unreported | ||
| IA/49880/2013 & IA/49881/2013 | Unreported | ||
| VA/09169/2013 & VA/09173/2013 | Unreported | ||
| IA/48047/2013 | Unreported | ||
| IA/21892/2014 | Unreported | ||
| IA/06557/2014 & Ors. | Unreported | ||
| [2014] UKUT 565 | Reported | Not applicable | |
| Case title: R (on the application of Isaac Kimondo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (relevant rules; AoS requirements) (IJR) | |||
| IA/20839/2014 & Ors. | Unreported | ||
| IA/43334/2013 | Unreported | ||
| IA/48810/2013 & Ors. | Unreported | ||
| AA/04602/2014 | Unreported | ||
| DA/02323/2013 | Unreported | ||
| DA/00171/2014 | Unreported | ||
| IA/22033/2014 | Unreported | ||
|
Search result:
...on the grounds that there was no evidence of financial dependency upon, or residence with, the EEA national sponsor either prior... |
|||
| IA/41661/2013 | Unreported | ||
|
Search result:
...claims and appeals when those claims have been refused. The dependency on their family was disputed and their medical conditions were... |
|||