Information Immigration and asylum chamber: decisions on appeals to the Upper Tribunal
Displaying Decision 8551 - 8580 of 8964 in total (most recent first)
Reference number | Status | Promulgation date | Country |
---|---|---|---|
[2013] UKUT 146 | Reported | Jamaica | |
Case title: Farquharson (removal – proof of conduct) | |||
Search result:
...84. Compassionate circumstances: His appeal was largely based on his private life with his mother, siblings and other relatives. His central contention... |
|||
[2013] UKUT 177 | Reported | Not applicable | |
Case title: R (on the application of MK) v Wolverhampton City Council (AAJR) | |||
[2013] UKUT 147 | Reported | Jamaica | |
Case title: Campbell (exclusion; Zambrano) | |||
Search result:
...in Jamaica. They have never been economically dependent on him. Private life 41. In relation to the appellant’s private life ties formed... |
|||
[2013] UKUT 89 | Reported | Pakistan | |
Case title: Ahmed (Amos; Zambrano; reg 15A(3)(c) 2006 EEA Regs) | |||
Search result:
...Immigration Rules at Appendix FM dealing with the right to private life for parents of a child in the UK over 7... |
|||
[2013] UKUT 86 | Reported | Not applicable | |
Case title: R (on the application of Mamour) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (FCJR) | |||
[2013] UKUT 342 | Reported | Not applicable | |
Case title: R on the application of A v London Borough of Croydon (AAJR) | |||
[2013] UKUT 46 | Reported | Azerbaijan | |
Case title: SL (Unmarried mother with mixed race child) | |||
[2013] UKUT 143 | Reported | Ethiopia | |
Case title: EG and NG (UT rule 17: withdrawal; rule 24: scope) | |||
[2013] UKUT 82 | Reported | India | |
Case title: RS (immigration/family court liaison: outcome) | |||
Search result:
...life he enjoys with his wife and H or his private life derived from his residence here. Our reasons for so finding... |
|||
[2013] UKUT 59 | Reported | Zimbabwe | |
Case title: CM (EM country guidance; disclosure) | |||
Search result:
...no protected family life here. Whilst he has a protected private life , this remains exiguous (EM [297]). He has the usual... |
|||
[2013] UKUT 60 | Reported | Nigeria | |
Case title: Ogundimu (Article 8 - new rules) | |||
Search result:
...made on his behalf in reliance on his family and private life in this country, requesting that the deportation order be revoked.... |
|||
[2012] UKUT 390 | Reported | Uzbekistan | |
Case title: LM (returnees – expired exit permit) | |||
[2012] UKUT 389 | Reported | Pakistan | |
Case title: MN and others (Ahmadis – country conditions – risk) | |||
[2012] UKUT 414 | Reported | Sri Lanka | |
Case title: Adamally and Jaferi (section 47 removal decisions: Tribunal Procedures) | |||
Search result:
...indeed. Instead of setting out any argument why the appellant’s private life ought to enable her to remain in the United Kingdom... |
|||
[2012] UKUT 393 | Reported | Nigeria | |
Case title: MF (Article 8 - new rules) | |||
Search result:
...by reference to terms of imprisonment so that Article 8 private life claims can only succeed if they not only have certain... |
|||
[2012] UKUT 397 | Reported | India | |
Case title: GS and EO (Article 3 – health cases) | |||
Search result:
...on the basis of an interference with his or her private life as an aspect of that individual’s ‘physical and moral integrity’... |
|||
[2012] UKUT 368 | Reported | Pakistan | |
Case title: Ali (s.120 - PBS) | |||
Search result:
...pursued before her. She accepted that the appellant had established private life as a student in the United Kingdom, however she concluded... |
|||
[2012] UKUT 308 | Reported | Sri Lanka | |
Case title: VT (Dublin Regulation: post-removal appeal) | |||
[2012] UKUT 309 | Reported | Bangladesh | |
Case title: Abdin (domicile – actually polygamous marriages) | |||
[2012] UKUT 268 | Reported | Portugal | |
Case title: MG (EU deportation – Article 28(3) – imprisonment) | |||
[2012] UKUT 304 | Reported | Philippines | |
Case title: Ferrer (limited appeal grounds; Alvi) | |||
Search result:
...would, consequently, constitute an interference with her right to a private life “and … this interference would not harm, for example immigration... |
|||
[2012] UKUT 269 | Reported | Nigeria | |
Case title: Onuekwere (imprisonment – residence) | |||
[2012] UKUT 236 | Reported | Zimbabwe | |
Case title: CM (Article 1F(a) - superior orders) | |||
Search result:
...life as it was “only a girlfriend/boyfriend situation”. Considered as private life this relationship lacked strength as they were not living together... |
|||
[2012] UKUT 218 | Reported | India | |
Case title: RS (immigration and family court proceedings) | |||
Search result:
...life he enjoys with his wife and H or his private life derived from his residence here. We apply the principles developed... |
|||
[2012] UKUT 216 | Reported | Ghana | |
Case title: Nimako-Boateng (residence orders - Anton considered) | |||
Search result:
...to the principal appellant Ms Holmes and looking at her private life (I shall come to IA later) I find that this... |
|||
[2012] UKUT 196 | Reported | Sierra Leone | |
Case title: Bah (EO (Turkey) - liability to deport) | |||
Search result:
...of the proportionality of the measures against the family or private life in question, and a weighing of all relevant factors. iii)... |
|||
[2012] UKUT 163 | Reported | Afghanistan | |
Case title: AK (Article 15(c)) | |||
[2012] UKUT 147 | Reported | Afghanistan | |
Case title: Ahmadi (s. 47 decision: validity; Sapkota) | |||
Search result:
...the ECHR. He found that the appellant had formed a private life in the United Kingdom, where the appellant had taken various... |
|||
[2012] UKUT 126 | Reported | Iraq | |
Case title: MK (documents - relocation) | |||
Search result:
...family being broken up. We have limited evidence of their private life in the United Kingdom, where they have been for some... |
|||
[2012] UKUT 97 | Reported | China | |
Case title: AX (family planning scheme) | |||
Search result:
...fifth question, that of the proportionality of removal. 208. The private life evidence before us under Article 8 was not extensive. Clearly... |