Information Immigration and asylum chamber: decisions on appeals to the Upper Tribunal
Displaying Decision 1 - 30 of 441 in total (most recent first)
Reference number | Status | Promulgation date | Country |
---|---|---|---|
UI-2024-005350 | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...threshold of “unduly harsh”. Underhill LJ, approves the formulation of McCloskey J in MK (Sierra Leone), approved by Lord Carnwath in... |
|||
UI-2024-004234 | Unreported | ||
UI-2024-003184 & UI-2024-003185 | Unreported | ||
UI-2023-004988 | Unreported | ||
UI-2024-002390 | Unreported | ||
UI-2023-005380 | Unreported | ||
UI-2022-000821 | Unreported | ||
UI-2023-004894 | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...the Home Department HU/00494/2017, heard by the Honourable Mr Justice McCloskey , then President of the Upper Tribunal, sitting at Field... |
|||
[2024] UKUT 00235 | Reported | Zimbabwe | |
Case title: Maisiri (EUSS, Zambrano, ‘Realistic Prospect’ policy) | |||
Search result:
...there considering whether to depart from a decision made by McCloskey J in this chamber of the Upper Tribunal. He noted... |
|||
UI-2023-001467 | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...parties an issue that has not previously been ventilated: see McCloskey J (as he then was) in AM (Fair hearing) Sudan... |
|||
UI-2023-001020 | Unreported | ||
UI-2023-005272 & Ors. | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...record was inaccurate. On appeal the Upper Tribunal (Mr Justice McCloskey and Upper Tribunal Judge Southern) reviewed the authorities on procedural... |
|||
UI-2023-003752 & UI-2023-003754 | Unreported | ||
UI-2023-004041 | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...the cohort of disabled people in society” (paragraph 43). Although McCloskey J held that someone else could, in theory, be substituted... |
|||
UI-2023-001598 | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...threshold of “unduly harsh”. Underhill LJ, approves the formulation of McCloskey J in MK (Sierra Leone), approved by Lord Carnwarth in... |
|||
UI-2022-003724 | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...within the knowledge of the respondent (a point emphasised by McCloskey J in Muhandiramge (section S-LTR.1.7) [2015] UKUT 00675 (IAC)). Applicants... |
|||
UI-2022-001833 | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...relies on the case of Miah in which Mr Justice McCloskey said at paragraph 13: “ These features of the context point... |
|||
UI-2022-002571 | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...separation of the roles of advocate and witness. Mr Justice McCloskey , the President as he then was of the Upper... |
|||
UI-2021-001176 | Unreported | ||
UI-2023-000755 | Unreported | ||
UI-2022-004589 | Unreported | ||
UI-2022-005320 | Unreported | ||
UI-2022-005189 | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...referred to paragraph [13] of the decision of Mr Justice McCloskey in MK Pakistan (duty to give reasons) [2013] UKUT 641,... |
|||
HU/16484/2017 | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...We turn to the decision of a Presidential panel (comprising McCloskey J and Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Mandalia, as he then... |
|||
UI-2022-005360 | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...himself. 27. Our attention was drawn to the comments of McCloskey J in SM and Qadir v Secretary of State for... |
|||
UI-2022-004054 | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...is expressed in terms very similar to those used by McCloskey J in that decision. 18. Mr Biggs reproduced [2] of... |
|||
UI-2022-002921 | Unreported | ||
IA/14940/2021 | Unreported | ||
HU/15952/2018 | Unreported | ||
Search result:
...and four years passed before the case finally came before McCloskey J and Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Mandalia (as he then... |
|||
IA/02686/2021 | Unreported | ||