Displaying Decision 721 - 750 of 9123 in total (most recent first)

Reference number Status Promulgation date Country
UI-2024-001114 & UI-2024-001117 Unreported
UI-2023-005231 Unreported
UI-2024-001010 Unreported
UI-2024-000987 Unreported
Search result:
...4. The judge considered rule 276 ADE(vi) and the appellant’s private life . The test of significant obstacles to her integration back...
UI-2024-001219 Unreported
Search result:
...July 2021 to refuse leave to remain based on his private life . 3. The Appellant is a national of Malaysia born...
UI-2024-001322 Unreported
UI-2024-001099 Unreported
UI-2024-001451 & Ors. Unreported
Search result:
...basis of their family life with each other and their private life . First-tier Tribunal Judge Taylor (“the Judge”) dismissed their linked...
UI-2022-006688 & UI-2022-006689 Unreported
Search result:
...her extended family in the united kingdom but with her private life . The judge had not made a one sided assessment,...
UI-2024-000970 Unreported
Search result:
...the Appellant in greater detail, given its relevance to his private life ties in this country. I accept that the volume of...
UI-2022-005516 Unreported
Search result:
...leave to remain on the basis of his family and private life in the UK. 2. That appeal came before First-tier Tribunal...
[2024] UKUT 00235 Reported Zimbabwe
Case title: Maisiri (EUSS, Zambrano, ‘Realistic Prospect’ policy)
Search result:
...see Considering the prospects of making a successful Appendix FM, private life or long residence application. Considering the prospects of making a...
UI-2023-002584 Unreported
Search result:
...interests the Judge finds that any interference with the Appellant’s private life in the UK is proportionate [82 – 83]. That is...
UI-2024-000974 Unreported
UI-2024-001625 Unreported
Search result:
...against the refusal of his Article 8 ECHR family and private life settlement claim, based on his claim of 20 years continuous...
PA/00296/2021 Unreported
Search result:
...accepted that the appellant and his family had developed a private life in the United Kingdom as they had been present for...
UI-2023-005479 & UI-2023-005480 Unreported
UI-2024-000151 Unreported
Search result:
...Dhanji accepted that the Appellant’s appeal in respect of his private life concerning any very significant obstacles to reintegration outside the Rules,...
UI-2023-005529 Unreported
Search result:
...31.12.20, which is also a material factor when assessing his private life pursuant to section 117B(5) NIAA 2002. However, the Appellant’s case...
UI-2024-001096 Unreported
Search result:
...the appellant’s Article 8 rights in terms of family or private life with his partner would be breached by his removal. Article...
JR-2023-LON-001885 Unreported
UI-2024-001307 Unreported
Search result:
...appeal, at §10, as follows: “(a) Has the Appellant established private life in the UK with which the Respondent’s actions have materially...
UI-2023-004149 Unreported
Search result:
...the Article 3 “medical ground” appeal and the Article 8 private life claim which is based on whether his circumstances meet the...
UI-2023-005402 Unreported
Search result:
...did not consider that the appellant met the family and private life exceptions to deportation for the purposes of Article 8 and...
UI-2024-000599 & Ors. Unreported
UI-2024-000909 Unreported
UI-2022-006613 Unreported
Search result:
...her family life with her partner, and second, on her private life , within and outside of the Immigration Rules (“the Rules”)....
UI-2024-000723 Unreported
Search result:
...Judge Grubb (JR/1358/2014).) 7. Thereafter, an application based on family/ private life was made on 16 September 2020, and refused on 12...
UI-2024-001201 Unreported
UI-2023-003411 Unreported
Displaying Decision 721 - 750 of 9123 in total (most recent first)